Slow starts aren't anything new to the Carolina Hurricanes. They've been known for having an underwhelming record during the month of October for years now and it always seems to take their best players awhile to get into top form. We seem to go through this every season, so the Canes posting a 4-5-3 record through October could end up being not that big of a deal in the big picture, especially with the Metropolitan Division being very weak right now. However, something that is very alarming is how poorly this team has played in first periods.
In their first 12 games, the Hurricanes have scored the first goal in only three of them and they've been outscored 10-4 in first periods as a whole. The Hurricanes have managed to grab points in seven of these games, so they are at least fighting their way back into games, but the fact that they are usually trailing after 20 minutes is still a pretty big problem. With hockey being a game of chance, I generally don't put a lot of thought into how much "momentum" is gained after scoring or giving up a goal. However, something everyone can agree on is that the Hurricanes constantly digging themselves into holes early in games is not a good thing and it's something that needs to be rectified sooner rather than later.
What's the root of the problem, though? Are the Canes coming out strong and falling behind after making a few mistakes? That would be the best case scenario but unfortunately, there are more than a few problems with the Hurricanes play in first periods this year.
If you thought the Canes -6 goal differential in the first period was bad then you might want to advert your eyes, because their microstats are much worse. The Canes have been getting outscored, outshot, outplayed and outworked in the first 20 minutes of just about every game this year.
If you wanted an explanation for Carolina's terrible Fenwick Close percentage but decent overall five-on-five rating, this is it. Carolina has been getting demolished in first periods and it goes all across the board. They're playing their way back into games in the second and third periods, but they are also trailing for most of that time, so that makes their numbers here slightly less impressive. The most frustrating thing is that the Hurricanes performance in second and third periods is passable and rather good overall, but the fact that they are trailing by 1-2 goals by that point sort of negates this. A closer look at the scoring chances reveals some even uglier numbers.
The Canes have been outchanced by 20 in first periods during five-on-five play alone…that is just awful and it doesn't matter which way you look at it. Again, they are showing a lot of resillence by playing solid hockey in the second and third frames, but always falling behind early isn't going to bode well for them long-term. It just seems like the team doesn't have any jump in their game for the first 20 minutes and they would rather let their opponents dictate the play instead.
None of this data is surprising to those who have watched the team, though. The real issue is finding the root of the problem and knowing how to correct it. Unfortunately, I don't have much of an answer for this right now because I'm not around the team and am not sure how they prepare for games. Although, I will say that their poor starts do not reflect well on the coaching staff or the player's gameday preparation. If it happens a couple times then it's not a big deal, but the numbers above speak for themselves.
It's strange because the Hurricanes have been nearly the opposite of last year's club. Only instead of being "fragile" and falling apart in the second & third periods, they are falling behind early and climbing their way back into games. Neither are good recipes for success and the Canes will need to sort out their first period issues very soon.